Choose work gloves by the protection and handling each job requires. Hand injuries are a common workplace risk. Too little protection leaves hands exposed; excessive bulk slows detail work. The wrong coating or poor fit can encourage workers to remove gloves, undermining the intended protection.
For federal contracting officers, purchase-card holders, and operations staff, a useful specification connects the task, protection, grip, and crew sizes.
This post is general information only, never legal advice. Follow OSHA guidance, manufacturer instructions, and your agency safety program and personal protective equipment (PPE) hazard assessment. Consult your contracting officer, agency safety official, or agency counsel for binding determinations.
Your agency's PPE hazard assessment drives glove selection. Ask your safety official to determine protection needs before comparing catalog options. OSHA's hand-protection standard, 29 CFR 1910.138, addresses selection based on hazards, task conditions, duration, and glove performance.
Consider gloves alongside the broader power tools and accessories used in maintenance work, without assuming gloves are appropriate for every tool operation.
ANSI/ISEA 105 classifies cut resistance using standardized testing, with A1 through A9 representing increasing cut resistance. These ratings help compare tested performance; they do not make a glove cut-proof.
These are orientation groupings, not OSHA requirements or task-specific prescriptions. Have your safety official establish the target A-range, then verify the exact rating marked on the specific product and its documentation.
A higher number is not automatically better. Compare dexterity, comfort, and cost alongside protection; construction affects how a glove performs in actual handling.
Abrasion resistance describes resistance to rubbing and surface wear. Puncture resistance concerns penetration by a pointed object under specified testing. Back-of-hand impact protection addresses blows and may be relevant where dropped tools or struck-by hazards exist.
A cut-resistant glove is not automatically puncture-proof or chemical-proof. A puncture rating does not establish protection against every point or needle. Check separate performance information, including impact data where required, rather than treating the cut rating as an overall safety score.
Match coating choice to the surfaces and contaminants actually handled. The comparisons below describe general tendencies, not guarantees; liner, thickness, coverage, and finish affect grip, dexterity, and wear.
| Type | Conditions and grip considerations | Dexterity and durability considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Uncoated knit | Dry, light handling; limited added surface grip | Flexible; wear and protection depend on yarn and construction |
| Polyurethane | Often considered for dry grip and small-part handling | Thin coatings support dexterity; verify wear performance |
| Nitrile | Commonly considered for abrasive handling and oily surfaces | Coverage and formulation affect flexibility, grip, and wear |
| Latex | Often considered for wet grip; address latex sensitivity/allergy | Flexible coatings; compare specific abrasion and wear data |
| Sandy/foam finishes | Textured finishes may support wet/oily grip, depending on design | Compare texture, coating wear, and handling feel |
| Leather | Commonly considered for dry, rough material handling | Thickness affects dexterity; wet conditions can change handling and care needs |
For fleet maintenance, distinguish oily parts handling from chemical contact. A grip coating is not evidence of chemical protection.
Knit gauge describes stitch density. Higher gauges generally allow finer, thinner construction, but gauge alone establishes neither cut resistance nor durability. Common liners include cotton, nylon, polyester, high-performance polyethylene, aramid, and blends; judge the finished glove's documented performance.
Disposable gloves may suit contamination control and light tasks when specifically appropriate. Reusable gloves commonly address heavier mechanical hazards. Neither category alone establishes suitability.
For janitorial tasks involving cleaning supplies, chemical protection depends on the specific chemical and the manufacturer's resistance data. Check the Safety Data Sheet (SDS), the glove manufacturer's chemical-resistance guide, and your safety official's direction. Do not infer resistance from a material name.
Measure each worker's hand as directed and use the manufacturer's sizing chart for the specific glove. Too-large gloves can snag or interfere with grip; too-small gloves can fatigue hands. Poorly fitting gloves are less likely to be worn consistently.
Offer the full crew size range. Compare knit wrists, adjustable closures, and extended cuffs for retention and coverage without interfering with other PPE. Check left/right-specific versus ambidextrous designs and touchscreen-compatible options where relevant. Confirm usable fit during safety-approved task trials.
Work gloves never replace machine guarding or lockout procedures. Follow your agency safety program around rotating equipment. Never wear gloves where entanglement is a hazard and agency or manufacturer guidance prohibits them.
General-purpose work gloves are not electrical insulating gloves. Electrical work requires properly rated and tested equipment selected under agency programs. Do not infer electrical protection from leather, rubber-like coatings, or a cut rating.
Inspect before use. Replace worn, damaged, or contaminated gloves under agency and manufacturer guidance. Follow approved laundering, drying, storage, and care instructions; do not assume cleaning restores protective performance.
Build a small task-based glove matrix: one approved selection per hazard/task group where suitable, rather than dozens of one-offs. Document selections in the site PPE plan. Stock the full required size range at each site, set par levels by crew size and replacement rate, and keep spares at the point of work.
Recheck selections when tasks or materials change. Browse safety, PPE, and facility categories after establishing requirements.
GoVets is a service-disabled veteran-owned small business supplier of maintenance, repair, and operations (MRO) and institutional supplies; review the capability statement.
For federal sourcing, review GoVets GSA Schedule information and its GSA Advantage listing for contract GS-35F-301GA, current period March 2022 through March 2027. Confirm specific item coverage, current scope, and agency purchasing procedures; general catalog availability does not establish Schedule eligibility. For sourcing questions, call 866-321-6321.
For related equipment planning, find “How to Choose Safety Glasses That Meet ANSI Z87.1,” “LED Work Lights: How Many Lumens Do You Actually Need?,” and “Choosing the Right Ladder: Fiberglass vs. Aluminum and Duty Ratings Explained” on the GoVets blog.